Employment Opportunities: Court Security

Here is a link to the US Marshals Service page about the Court Security Officer (CSO) program https://www.usmarshals.gov/judicial/court_security_officer.htm

As these are all contractor positions the vendor for the local area is Paragon Systems, they handle the 4th Circuit (MD, VA, WV & NC), the 3rd Circuit (PA, NJ, DE) and the federal court houses in DC. The link to their page is https://careers.parasys.com/home#working-here

This is not a bad job for a retiree who wants to keep working.


Employment Opportunity – Security

Defender One Security is looking to hire 3-4 Active Baltimore County Police Officers for Uniformed Secondary Employment located in Cockeysville (PC7).  The compensation is $32/HR, and the hours are 8:30AM-3:30PM Monday through Friday. We are looking to hire ASAP for the June schedule.

If interested, and for more details regarding this position, please contact Jon N. Krieger (retired Baltimore County Police Officer) directly at 410-404-5293, or email to Jon@defenderonesecurity.com.

Contract Ratification Results

The tentative settlement agreement between the Baltimore County Administration and Baltimore County Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #4 (FOP) was presented to the membership for ratification. The ratification process was done electronically via department email and a secured voting system through Election Buddy for 5 days in an effort to provide the opportunity for as many members as possible to vote. The ballots were tallied after voting closed at 1200 hours on April 27, 2021.

The voting totals were as follow: FOR Ratification – 767  AGAINST – 141

This Memorandum of Understanding is for July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2023

Thank you to all of those who participated.

Thank you everyone on the Negotiating Committee for all your hard work and do diligence in getting this contract out to our membership.

Also, I would like to thank all of our board members that helped our membership with questions that may have had with the contract.

Dave Rose


Final Reports and Summary of Legislation on Police Reform

The links below will provide information as to the legislation that passed in Annapolis this year in reference to the Maryland Police Accountability Act as well as other legislation tracked by the FOP. It also summarizes what bills will go into effect this year in October and those that go into effect on July 1, 2022.

There are provisions in our contract in article 16 that will remain in effect until our contract expires on June 30, 2023.  If you have any questions about any specific provision that is not answered in the below material please call the lodge office and we will get you an answer.

2021 MPAA – Full Summary 4-12-21

2021 MPAA – Indexed Summary 4-14-21

2021 FOP Report final report Edited 04-14-21-1

Final Summary of 2021 Session for FOP

Due Process Comparison Chart

Employment Opportunity Elizabethtown Police Department

My name is Ed Cunningham, and I’m the Chief of the Elizabethtown Police Department (Lancaster County, PA). I am also a long-time (now retired) member of the Pittsburgh Police FOP Fort Pitt Lodge #1.  We currently have job openings in our agency.  All of the information, as well as the application, can be found at www.policeapp.com/elizabethtownpa. The application deadline is 7 May 21.

Also, I’d be happy to answer any questions that you may have about the job or department.

Thank you, and have a great day!

Chief Ed Cunningham, MS

Chief of Police

Elizabethtown Police

600 South Hanover Street

Elizabethtown, PA 17022

717-367-6540 x251 (voice)

717-367-2332 (fax)

717-367-1835 (county dispatch)

President’s Message – Blame Failed Policy and Management, Not the LEOBR

Common misconceptions about The Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights (LEOBR) have continued to spread and grow as police reform remains one of this legislative session’s prominent issues. For years, the Baltimore County FOP Lodge #4 has been committed to enforcing responsible policing and accountability across our county and state. Irresponsible policing is not a result of LEOBR, but rather, years of policy failures by management.

For example, methods like Broken Windows Policing, introduced in 1982, which argued that maintaining order by policing low-level offenses could prevent more serious crimes, incident-driven policing in the early 1990’s, and zero tolerance policing in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s (both implemented by legislative bodies and chiefs), have resulted in damaged relationships with the citizens officers are meant to protect.

To be clear, these decisions were not made by rank-and-file officers. They were conceived and enforced by those in command positions. Commanders draft all policies, strategies, and methods. As a result of many of these failed initiatives, law enforcement officers today are paying the price for antiquated policies they were required to enforce. Instead of blaming rank and file officers, commanders should be held accountable for many of the failures we are witnessing.

For additional context, the LEOBR was implemented in 1974 to prevent police chiefs from terminating officers indiscriminately for political expediency or personal bias – not to protect bad cops. We have seen examples of this in the recent lawsuit brought against the Maryland State Police by a group of African American officers. The LEOBR was implemented to expose unbiased truth in investigations, not to achieve a desired result. Simply put, the system is not broken. Today, agencies mismanage the process and then blame the LEOBR to cover for their broad incompetence. Eliminating the LEOBR in the name of police reform is a disservice to the overwhelming number of law enforcement officers who perform their duties honorably and professionally.

Police reform is essential. However, meaningful reform will not happen with the elimination of a fair, due process system with 47 years of case law to support it. It is, however, the implementation of practices that promote community engagement, conversation, and interaction between law enforcement and those they serve, that will promote positive change. The removal of this process will have unintended consequences. Already, too many good officers are choosing to resign, and others interested in serving suggest some level of discouragement or concern about joining the profession.

Officers are not perfect. Like all humans, they cannot operate under the expectation of perfection and infallibility. No one can. It’s time to come together to discuss how we can make real change. A solution can only be accomplished through honest dialogue around accountability, safety, and devotion to those we serve.

Dave Rose
FOP Lodge #4


Fact Sheet About the Maryland Law Enforcement Bill of Rights (LEOBR)

This a document that talks about the Maryland Law Enforcement Officer’s Bill of Rights (LEOBR) and explains the purpose for the creation of the bill and guides you through the different sections of the LEOBR.

It will show the bills limitations and give facts to dispel the misinformation that has been spoken about in different media, social media and political formats. Please take a few moments to learn the truth about this landmark piece of legislation.

Community Conversation and Reference Guide -Part 3 – Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights

President’s Message – Annapolis Update – LEOBR

Brothers and Sisters,

As most of you are aware, the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (LEOBR) is in danger of being eliminated this year in the Maryland General Assembly (MDGA). This statute gives you the right to fair due process when a complaint of misconduct has been made against you. Numerous Senators and delegates are working to repeal this provision in state law. Instead of having this structured fair process as outlined in the LEOBR, they are working on legislation that would give Police Chiefs and Sheriffs the absolute authority to discipline and/or terminate with out a fair hearing. The ACLU, in conjunction with the Maryland Chiefs of Police Association have seized this opportunity to attempt to eliminate what little due process you have and obtain more authority for themselves.

FOP Lodge 4 and other lodges across Maryland are working diligently to prevent this from occurring. The State FOP has contracted with a reputable Public Relations Firm to assist with traditional and social media platforms and messaging. We have the www.keepmarylandsafe.com website which has helped with over 40,000 emails being sent by our members to the representatives in the MDGA. We have had individual and group meetings with many senators and delegates. However, we need you and everyone you know to start calling each of the senators and delegates on our website and speak to them about the need for a fair disciplinary process.

Senate Bill 627 -LEOBR Repeal is scheduled to be voted out of committee this evening. Please contact your representative now.


Dave Rose
FOP Lodge #4

Please Contact these Legislators and Tell Them To Support Law Enforcement

Law enforcement officers dedicate their careers and risk their lives to protect Marylander’s across the state. It’s a job like no other—uniquely dangerous and challenging—requiring life and death split-second decisions. When you call us, we respond.

The Maryland General Assembly is considering legislation HB670 that takes away the fair due process afforded to those who risk their lives for your safety.

Please contact the legislators on the two committees below and tell them to oppose HB670 and as well as all other legislation that alters the LEOBR.

House Judiciary Committee Members- 2021

Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Members- 2021

The State FOP Needs your Help to Protect the LEOBR

As you know, the 2021 Maryland General Assembly session is underway. State FOP leadership has had daily discussions with the Senate and House leadership, our legal team, lobbyists, public relations firm, community stakeholders, and the State Lodge Legislative Committee. Additionally, we have already testified, or written opposition letters, on several proposed pieces of legislation.
Due to restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the pending fight to protect our members from misguided police reforms, the Legislative Committee started earlier than usual this year. We are actively tracking numerous bills which you can find on our website.
As of today, there are a total of 741 bills filed in the House and 573 in the Senate. Police reform bills continue to be filed at a rapid pace. Today, House “leadership sponsored” police reform bills, HB670, Repeal of the LEOBR and HB671, Disclosure of Police Discipline Records, were introduced. It is imperative that we start our messaging campaign now.
We have enlisted the services of a public relations firm to assist with the creation of digital and radio advertisements, a specialized website aimed at supporting sensible police reforms, and a messaging campaign for FOP members. We must solicit the help of our family and friends to help spread our message. We want them to help tell our story via social media channels and, in the process, use specific “hashtags” to help humanize our profession.
Part of our strategy is to use social media platforms to guide community members and legislators towards the overwhelmingly positive aspects of the law enforcement community and toward our new “tagline:” #KeepMarylandSafe. We ask each of you to talk to your family, friends and associates and encourage them to participate.
Our new KeepMarylandSafe.com website is live and it will serve as an outlet for news and information pertinent to our agenda. The website will relay FOP positions on proposed legislation, and will provide an avenue to easily contact legislators with predetermined FOP messages of support or opposition.
Shortly after the filing of these police reform bills, the Maryland State Lodge will produce specific talking points for each of you to discuss with your local stakeholders. Our expectation is that the  police reform bills will will move quickly. Because the legislature is intent on expedient rather than quality reforms, this legislative process could be over within 30 days of the bill filings.
Make no mistake… this will be a hard fight! The current desire of many within the legislature is to completely repeal the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights. Part of our strategy is to pressure legislators through direct contact, and to wage a full-scale messaging campaign from FOP members, associates and concerned citizens. If you have any questions, concerns, or ideas do not hesitate to contact the lodge for assistance.


Diversity and Inclusion Days

On January 19, 2021, the Department sent an email concerning the County Executive’s approval of 2 additional Diversity and Inclusion Floating Days off.


As you know, the amount of leave that members of the Department receive is covered by the terms of our MOU and any effort to change those terms needs to occur at the bargaining table.  We are currently in bargaining with the County over the terms of the next MOU and have expressed to the County and the Department our dismay that this issue was not discussed with the FOP before the communication was sent.  We expect to address this issue in those negotiations.


Protecting the mental health of Maryland police officers

The FOP is SUPPORTING this Bill

By: Capital News Service Jacob Steinberg January 21, 2021

ANNAPOLIS — Maryland police officers who are dealing with stressors — such as family issues, substance abuse or mass protests — will have access to confidential mental health aid under a bill progressing in the state Legislature.

The Police Officers Mental Health Employee Assistance Program, sponsored by Del. Benjamin Brooks, D-Baltimore County, and Sen. Mary Washington, D-Baltimore, would require each law enforcement agency to provide its officers with access to an employee assistance or mental health program at a minimal cost to the officer.

These employee assistance programs include confidential counseling services, crisis counseling, stress management counseling and peer support services for police officers.

“One in four police officers have thought about committing suicide at one point in their career,” Brooks told Capital News Service.

An important component of these employee assistance programs focuses on protecting police officers’ mental health during periods of public demonstration and unrest.

Looking out for police officers’ mental health during those periods is now more prevalent than ever, as protests have increased throughout the United States over the past year.

Currently, an Employee Assistance Program, administered through the Department of Budget and Management, is only offered to state employees.

However, this bill would mandate similar programs in every law enforcement agency throughout Maryland, allowing police officers in local municipalities around the state to receive mental health assistance if necessary.

“It doesn’t matter whether your police department is 25 people or 400 people,” Washington said.

While providing police officers mental health resources is a key priority, so is ensuring the confidentiality that comes along with accepting those services.

“Confidentiality is the biggest thing with mental health,” Dr. Annette Hanson, joint legislative committee chair for the Maryland Psychiatric Society and Washington Psychiatric Society, told Capital News Service.

Confidentiality is vital when it comes to mental health because it’s become such a highly stigmatized issue — particularly in fields like the military and law enforcement.

Under this bill, police officers would receive the help they need, and avoid potential repercussions from the department or fellow officers.

“It makes our law enforcement officers feel that they’re more than a badge, that they’re human,” Lt. Marc Junkerman of the Harford County Sheriff’s Office, said in support of HB088 at a Tuesday hearing.

Before initially introducing the bill last year, Brooks  began to conduct research as he came across some information about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

A Vietnam War veteran, Brooks was aware of PTSD, but he began learning more about the startling statistics related to police officers and mental health struggles.

In 2019, 228 police officers died by suicide compared to 172 officers the year before, according to Blue H.E.L.P. an organization dedicated to reducing the stigma around mental health.

Not only do these mental health challenges affect the police officers, but their family members can also be greatly affected as well.

Last year, a police officer’s wife approached Washington and explained the challenges that family members deal with when their partner is experiencing mental health issues.

Some of these challenges can include the officers exhibiting a change in behavior — possibly turning violent or turning to alcohol and other sources as coping mechanisms for the traumas they’ve faced.

To mitigate some of these familial challenges, under this program family members can report to the employee assistance program if they feel their spouse or parent is in need of mental health assistance.

Brooks and Washington initially introduced this bill last year, when it passed through the House unanimously but failed in the Senate because the 2020 session ended early due to the coronavirus pandemic.

“When the officer goes to my door or my neighbor’s door, I just want them to be whole,” Brooks said.

Md. Senate bill would permit disclosure of police misconduct probes

The FOP is OPPOSED to this Bill

By: Steve Lash Daily Record Legal Affairs Writer January 21, 2021
Saying the legislation would help uncover law enforcement’s bad apples, a Baltimore state senator urged her colleagues Thursday to pass legislation that would remove documents relating to police misconduct investigations from the list of “personnel records” automatically exempt from disclosure under the Maryland Public Information Act.
Sen. Jill P. Carter said her bill was spurred by the alleged in-police-custody killing of a 19-year-old Black man by Eastern Shore police officers, including one who was allegedly hired despite a record of violent conduct in earlier law enforcement jobs. Carter, a Democrat, has dubbed her legislation Anton’s Law in honor of the victim, Anton Black.

Removing misconduct investigations from MPIA’s personnel records exemption would subject details of an officer’s actions to public scrutiny and prevent misbehaving officers from finding continued employment in law enforcement, Carter told the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, on which she sits.

“It should not require a special investigation … for the public to learn of misconduct and coverups within police departments,” Carter said. “Sadly, this is the case routinely.”

Black’s 2018 death while handcuffed and prone was eerily similar to George Floyd’s last spring under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer. Floyd’s death touched off nationwide protests and calls for police reform, while Black’s has drawn far less publicity beyond the towns of Greensboro, Ridgely and Centreville, which had police officers involved in the killing, according to the family’s lawsuit against the police and towns.

The lawsuit, filed last month in U.S. District Court in Baltimore, alleges the police officers’ use of excessive and deadly force violated Black’s constitutional right against unreasonable seizures. In addition, the lawsuit claims that the Greensboro Police Department negligently hired officer Thomas Webster IV despite a record of violence in his career.

Under the proposed Anton’s Law, Senate Bill 178, each police department’s custodian of the requested documents would retain discretion under the MPIA to deny the information request if disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, interfere with an investigation, endanger an individual’s life or reveal a confidential source.

Speaking in support of the bill, an ACLU of Maryland attorney said permitting the discretionary disclosure of police misconduct investigations would  be “an absolutely necessary first step” toward addressing “the veil of secrecy” surrounding them

Without passage of Anton’s Law, police departments can tell people seeking documents of a misconduct investigation that they cannot be released because they are personnel records and that those seeking the information should “trust us. We did the right thing,” David Rocah told the committee.

“That is not an acceptable state of affairs … and not a way to create or maintain trust” in the police, said Rocah, a senior attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union’s Maryland chapter.

David Morris, on behalf of Maryland police chiefs and sheriffs associations, told the committee that the personnel records exception is too strict in that investigations of police shootings and use of force resulting in death or serious injury are of significant public concern and should be disclosable subject to the department’s statutory discretion.

However, investigations of officer misconduct short of gunfire or serious injury should still qualify as nondisclosable personnel records unless the complaint has been sustained, Morris said.

“It is equally important that we protect the reputations of the officers from frivolous types of complaints,” Morris added. “We need to protect the reputations of the officers from secondary dissemination of those types of reports.”

Baltimore County State’s Attorney Scott D. Shellenberger also endorsed the disclosure of police misconduct investigations that have been sustained by the department. He said “mere allegations” of misconduct should remain protected from disclosure as a personnel record.

But Sen. Charles E. Sydnor III, a committee member, said permitting unsustained complaints to escape public disclosure and scrutiny would have well-served Bull Connor, whose tenure as public safety commissioner of Birmingham, Alabama, in the 1960s was marked by police brutality against Blacks, whose complaints he rejected.

“The bad apples would be allowed to continue on,” said Sydnor, D-Baltimore County.

Carter cited reports from civil rights groups, including the ACLU of Maryland, that an overwhelming majority of complaints of police misconduct in Maryland are not sustained —  including allegations of harassment and false imprisonment —  and would therefore not be disclosable under the proposal offered by Morris and Shellenberger.

“The devil, all of the abuse and all of the ugliness, is actually in that large body of unsustained complaints because too many law enforcement agencies, when they conduct these investigations in secret, don’t have to disclose any of it and so this is why so many complaints go unsustained.”

Webster is a named defendant in the lawsuit with Ridgely Police Chief Dennis Manos and Centreville police officer Dennis Lannon – the three officers who allegedly seized Black on Sept. 15, 2018. Another defendant is former Greensboro Police Chief Michael Petyo for his allegedly negligent hiring of Webster.

The Maryland Police Training and Standards Commission decertified Webster as a police officer in July 2019 after its investigation revealed nearly 30 “use of force “ incidents from Webster’s time in Dover, Delaware, that were not disclosed on his police application in Maryland.

Petyo, who quit his police post during the state’s investigation of Webster, pleaded guilty in 2019 to misconduct in office for having lied on Webster’s application for certification.

Caroline County Circuit Judge Paul M. Bowman sentenced Petyo to two years in prison, all suspended, and three years’ supervised probation.

Black died from positional asphyxia, according to the complaint. However, the state medical examiner’s office attributed Black’s death to a congenital heart defect and his mental health issues.

The complaint said the medical examiner’s finding was erroneous and led to Caroline County State’s Attorney Joseph Riley’s decision in January 2019 not to prosecute the officer’s for homicide.

The case is docketed at the U.S. District Court in Baltimore as Jennell Black et al. v. Thomas Webster IV et al., No. 1:20-cv-03644-CCB.

Baltimore County FOP Lodge #4 mobile APP is now active!

Baltimore County FOP Lodge #4 now has an APP!  We will be using this as another way to quickly and effectively communicate with the membership.  We have partnered with the National FOP and used their platform. You can access it by going to the National FOP APP and search for Baltimore County FOP Lodge #4 .

Please download it and take advantage of the different resources that are available on the platform.